Skip to main content
Home
Debate
Positions
Arguments
Evidence
Resources
News
Bibliography
Authors
Organizations
About
FAQ
Blog
Contact
Login
Register for an account
U.S. should not agree to the nuclear deal with Iran
POSITION
U.S. should not agree to the nuclear deal with Iran
Nuclear deal will not successfully prevent Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon
Nuclear deal with Iran cannot be effectively verified
Nuclear deal with Iran repeats the mistakes of the failed 1994 Agreed Framework with North Korea
Nuclear deal with Iran would harm U.S. interests
Nuclear deal will undermine nonproliferation efforts
Iran will use sanctions relief to escalate its destabilizing foreign operations
Nuclear deal with Iran will only further destabilize region
Nuclear deal with Iran would not benefit U.S. interests
Nuclear deal with Iran more likely to benefit hardliners than promote democratic reform
There are multiple alternatives to the current nuclear deal with Iran
Covert operations are a viable option to prevent Iran from developing a nuclear weapon
Regime change could resolve Iranian nuclear crisis
U.S. should increase funding for democracy promotion in Iran
Military option could resolve Iranian nuclear crisis
U.S. can prevent Iran from closing Straits of Hormuz
Israeli attack on Iraqi Osirak reactor in 1981 shows effectiveness of pre-emptive strikes for stopping nuclear weapons programs
Israel has Military Capacity to Strike Iran
Military option would not necessarily reverse democratic reform
Multilateral enrichment facilities could resolve Iranian nuclear crisis
Coercive diplomacy could work to get a better deal with Iran
Credible military threat has been effective at pressuring Iran
Sanctions have been effective at changing Iran's behavior
Arguments
Authors
Cases
Citations
Evidence
News
Organizations
Positions
About
—
Contact
—
Updates
Terms of Use
—
Privacy Policy
Site powered by the
Open Debate Engine
.
