News: By Source

The author argues that the Trump administration should show restraint and avoid further sanctions on Iran as this would imperil the Iran nuclear deal, leading to another "costly U.S. war in the Middle East."
[ More ]
The author argues that North Korea's latest nuclear test shows that they are pursuing a similar incentive-laden nuclear deal like the one the West offered Iran to change its behavior.
[ More ]
Joel Rubin argues that rejection of the nuclear deal with Iran would lead to either "an unconstrained Iran that can advance its nuclear program or a trade war that will make maintenance of the sanctions unsustainable."
[ More ]
The author argues that because the nuclear deal failed to address Iran's aggressive foreign policy, it will likely be a point of contention during the lifetime of the deal, and even "a perfectly constructed nuclear agreement backed by sanctions and threats of force will eventually fall apart, leading either to war with Iran or an Iran armed with nuclear weapons"
[ More ]
Matthew Bunn argues that after the 10-15 year term of the nuclear deal, Iranian hardliners will have a hard time convincing the public and parliment that they should pursue a nuclear weapon.
[ More ]
The author argues that a new arms race is likely to erupt in the Middle East as Gulf States look to counter Iran's growing ballistic missile arsenal (that remains unchecked after the nuclear deal) which will in turn "incentivize Iran’s building of more missiles to overwhelm and defeat missile defenses, while also allowing Tehran to assert its need for Russia’s S-300 anti-air missile system."
[ More ]
Eric R. Terzuolo argues that the nuclear deal undermines the nonproliferation regime by moving the international community from global policies towards "a phase of ad hoc approaches to proliferation concerns, employing specific political geometries."
[ More ]
The authors argue that a military campaign against Iran's nuclear facilities would initiate a disastarous, decades long-war irrespective of technical capacity or whether Israel or U.S. initiates it.
[ More ]
The author argues that, paradoxically, an Iranian economy that is growing and reconnected to the world economy is more susceptible to sanctions due to U.S. dominance of the global financial system.
[ More ]
The authors review and debunk six of the most common misconceptions about the nuclear deal with Iran.
[ More ]