U.S. should continue to aggressively challenge Iran's destabilizing regional operations through continued sanctions and assistance to our allies
The basic outlines of such a strategy are clear. The urgency of the situations in Iraq and Syria demands active American involvement in those conflicts, not necessarily through the deployment of US combat troops, but certainly through the deployment of advisers, support elements, enablers (including air power), and intelligence to assist the majorities in both countries who seek to reject both al Qaeda and Iranian domination. Hezbollah’s invasion of Syria has exacerbated rifts within Lebanon and opened the possibility of driving a wedge between Hezbollah and other parts of Lebanese society. Aggressive diplomacy and well-targeted assistance could help weaken Hezbollah’s control over its vital base, forcing it to refocus on Lebanon and away from supporting Assad. The US must also work seriously—and not through speeches—to regain the confidence of our Arab allies, particularly Saudi Arabia and Turkey. America’s retreat from the region has increased the costs of implementing such a strategy, but we must keep in mind that things are not going terribly well for Iran either, despite the current euphoria in Tehran. A strategy that combines continued sanctions with meaningful efforts to displace and disrupt Iran’s proxies and Iran’s strategies in the region is essential to creating any prospect of long-term change in Tehran’s attitudes and of regional stability.
Quicktabs: Evidence
Arguments
-
The U.S. is committed to reducing the destabilizing impact of Iran's foreign policy in the region even after the nuclear deal. Existing sanctions and financial instruments against Iran's support for terrorist groups will remain in effect under the nuclear deal and the U.S. is reaching out to its GCC partners to further cooperate to contain Iran.
Related Quotes:- Under the nuclear deal, U.S. will maintain all sanctions against Iran's terrorist proxies and IRGC
- U.S. already has sophisticated tools to track and respond if Iran diverts funds towards regional aggression
- Iran will have fewer incentives to engage in regional aggression after the nuclear deal but U.S. and its allies are well prepared to counter them
- U.S. should continue to aggressively challenge Iran's destabilizing regional operations through continued sanctions and assistance to our allies
- Camp David Summit has laid the groundwork for GCC states to cooperate with U.S. in restraining Iran's aggression after the nuclear deal
- After nuclear deal is resolved, U.S. should cooperate with regional allies to challenge Iran's aggressive foreign activities